检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]解放军第一一七医院妇产科,浙江杭州310013
出 处:《中国医学工程》2016年第5期21-23,共3页China Medical Engineering
摘 要:目的探讨PK刀在腹腔镜下子宫全切除术中的应用价值。方法回顾分析2015年3月‐2015年9月该院74例腹腔镜下子宫切除术患者的临床资料,其中应用PK刀组39例(观察组),双极电凝组35例(对照组),采用腹腔镜下次全子宫切除(LSH)及腹腔镜下全子宫切除术(LTH)两种手术方式,对比分析两组患者的手术情况及短期疗效数据。结果观察组患者在手术时间、术中出血量和术后排气时间上均优于对照组(P<0.05);两组患者术后住院天数比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论 PK刀在腹腔镜下子宫切除术中的应用具有创伤小、术中出血少及术后肠道功能恢复快等优点,有推广应用的价值。【Objective】To evaluate the clinical effects of plasma kinetic tissue management system(PK scalpel) in laparoscopic hysterectomy.【Methods】From March 2015 to September 2015, a total of 74 patients suffering from single hysteromyoma underwent laparoscopic hysterectomy. Thirty-nine patients in the study group were treated with PK scalpel, while 35 patients in the control group were treated with bipolar scalpel. All the patients underwent only two modus operandi: 1aparoscopic subtotal hysterectomy(LSH) and 1aparoscopic total hysterectomy(LTH). The general situation of operation and short-term effi cacy data of patients in the two groups were compared.【Results】Compared with the control group, the study group was signifi cantly better in operative time, blood loss and the postoperative discharge time(P〈0.05). There were no signifi cant differences in hospital stay between the two groups(P〉0.05).【Conclusion】PK scalpel is a very good medical device for laparoscopic hysterectomy and worth promoting in clinic.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222