检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:付大学[1]
出 处:《郑州大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2016年第2期40-43,158,共4页Journal of Zhengzhou University:Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition
基 金:中国人民大学2015年度拔尖创新人才培育资助计划成果
摘 要:现行价格法律制度以公共产品"重要性"作为政府定价的衡量标准,严重制约了PPP模式的推行。PPP模式本身具有利益平衡、价格均衡和价格生成之困境,为科学合理定价带来困难。价格法律制度应根据公共产品是否具有竞争性来确定PPP模式下定价模式。对于竞争性公共产品或者竞争性环节,政府通过引进和维护竞争来实现市场价格均衡,即实行市场调节价。对强自然垄断属性公共产品,在赋予企业定价权的前提下,(在PPP合作过程中)实行价格上限、标尺竞争规制和(在PPP合作之前)特许经营制度,即实行价格上限下的自主定价。The current pricing legal system,taking the importance of public products as the standards for governmental pricing regulation,has seriously constrained the promotion of the PPP pattern. In addition,the intrinsic dilemma of interest balance,price equilibrium and price generation resulting from the PPT pattern has made reasonable pricing somewhat difficult. Therefore,pricing system should determine the pricing pattern according to the competitiveness of public products according to the PPT pattern. For highly competitive public products or links,the government should introduce and maintain competition to guarantee the balance of market price,.As for public products of natural monopoly,the governments should,after giving enterprise pricing right,implement such economic policies as setting price ceilings,designing Yardstick competition regulation( during the PPP cooperation) and franchise systems,namely the policy of independent pricing under the price ceiling.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.202