检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]牡丹江医学院红旗医院药学部,黑龙江牡丹江157011
出 处:《中国医院用药评价与分析》2016年第6期765-767,共3页Evaluation and Analysis of Drug-use in Hospitals of China
摘 要:目的:探讨3种磺脲类药用于2型糖尿病初始治疗的短期经济学效果。方法:选取2012年8月—2015年8月牡丹江医学院红旗医院收治的2型糖尿病患者180例作为研究对象,以随机数字表法分为格列美脲组、格列喹酮组和格列吡嗪组,每组各60例。格列美脲组患者给予格列美脲4 mg,1日1次;格列喹酮组患者给予格列喹酮15 mg,1日3次;格列吡嗪组患者给予格列吡嗪15 mg,1日1次。12周为1个疗程,治疗过程中检测血糖及糖化血红蛋白(Hb A1c)。结果:格列美脲组患者的总有效率显著高于格列吡嗪组,格列美脲组患者餐后2 h血糖下降百分率、Hb A1c下降率均显著高于格列喹酮组、格列吡嗪组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);将评价指标设定为餐后2 h血糖下降百分率,格列美脲组、格列喹酮组比格列吡嗪组分别增加了8.44、17.54元;将评价指标设定为Hb A1c下降率,格列美脲组、格列喹酮组比格列吡嗪组分别增加了36.49、53.96元;餐后2 h血糖下降百分率、Hb A1c下降率均不敏感于药品价格;3组患者的不良反应发生率之间的差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:格列美脲较格列喹酮与格列吡嗪初治2型糖尿病短期经济学效果好。OBJECTIVE:To probe into the short-term economic effects of 3 kinds of sulfonylurea drugs in the initial treatment of type II diabetes .METHODS: 180 patients with type II diabetes admitted into Hongqi Hospital of Mudanjiang Medical University from Aug .2012 to Aug .2015 were selected to be divided into glimepiride group , gliquidone group and glipizide group via the random number table , with 60 cases in each .Patients in glimepiride group were treated with glimepiride 4 mg, once a day;the gliquidone group were given gliquidone 15 mg, 3 times a day;and the glipizide group received glenn pyrazine 15 mg, once a day; 12 weeks for a treatment course .And the blood glucose , HbA1 c were determined during the treatment process .RESULTS:The total effective rate of glimepiride group was was significantly higher than that of glipizide group;the decent percentage of blood glucose after 2 h and HbA1 c of glimepiride group were significantly higher than those of gliquidone group and glipizide group , with statistically significant difference ( P 〈0.05 ) .To set the indicators as decent percentage of 2 h postprandial blood glucose , compared with glipizide group , glimepiride group, gliquidone group had increased by 8.44 yuan, 17.54 yuan.And to set the indicators as decent percentage of HbA 1 c, compared with glipizide group , glimepiride group , gliquidone group had increased by 36.49 yuan, 53.96 yuan.The decent percentage of 2 h postprandial blood glucose and HbA 1 c were insensitive to the price of drugs; the differences of incidence of adverse drug reactions among three groups were not significant (P〉0.05).CONCLUSIONS:The short-term economics effects of glimepiride is better than gliquidone and glipizide in the initial treatment of type 2 diabetes.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.142.242.51