检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:赵静波[1]
机构地区:[1]长春理工大学法学院
出 处:《吉林大学社会科学学报》2016年第4期106-115,191,共10页Jilin University Journal Social Sciences Edition
摘 要:当下行政案例指导制度在适用中面临诸多的问题和困难,加强制度改革与创新,实现由行政案例指导制度向行政判例制度的转型是一种理想选择。个案解释应成为实现统一法律适用、司法价值追求和法律解释的重要途径和方式。方法论意义上具有形式推理与实质推理组合形态的行政判例和司法定向理论下决断论的理论逻辑,为以个案解释实现司法公正的制度转型提供了正当性基础。实现由行政案例指导制度向行政判例制度的转型,通过将典型行政案例上升为行政判例并作为个案性司法解释、明确界定行政判例的制定主体、重视行政判例的类型化研究等方面展开。At present administrative case guidance system is facing many problems and difficulties in the process of application. An ideal choice is to strengthen reform and innovation,to realize the transformation from administrative case guidance system to administrative case system. Individual interpretation should be the important w ays and means to achieve a unified application of law,judicial value and legal interpretation. In the sense of methodology the administrative case system w hich has the form of combination of formal reasoning and substance reasoning and theoretical Logic of decisionism in the view of judicial point theory w hich provides the legitimate basis for legal justices by individual interpretation. The transformation is to be discussed by typical administrative cases raised to administrative cases w hich w ill be judicial interpretation for an individual case,explicitly defining the formulation body of administrative case,emphasizing on the study of administrative case types.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222