检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]江苏省社会科学院区域发展研究中心,江苏南京210013 [2]江苏理工学院商学院,江苏常州213001
出 处:《科技管理研究》2016年第14期145-151,共7页Science and Technology Management Research
基 金:江苏省社会科学基金资助项目"江苏制造业攀升价值链高端的对策研究"(11EYC018);国家社科基金项目"劳动力成本上升支撑经济结构优化的机制与政策影响研究"(14CJL011)
摘 要:从投入产出的效率角度,运用几种DEA方法和中国省际层面数据,实证评价生产性服务业发展对制造业升级的促进效应。研究结果发现,目前中国生产性服务业发展对制造业升级的促进效应仍处于较低水平,主要归因于生产性服务业发展的规模效率偏低,生产性服务业整体规模不足和内部结构不合理并存;而且,生产性服务业发展对制造业升级的促进效率及其原因存在着显著的东中西地区差异和省际差异。基于以上结论,提出中国生产性服务业发展促进制造业升级的相应政策建议。From the perspective of input - output efficiency, the paper evaluates the promotion effect of producer service industry development on manufacturing industry upgrading with several DEA methods and China' s provincial data. The results show that, the present promotion effect of producer service industry development on manufacturing industry upgrading in China is still at a low level, which is mainly ascribed to the low scale efficiency of producer service industry, also both the insufficient overall scale and the unreasonable internal structure. Besides, there are significant east - middle - west regional and provincial differences in the promotion efficiency and its reasons for the development of producer service industry promoting manufacturing industry upgrading. Based on the above conclusions, the corresponding policy recommendations on developing China' s producer service industry benefiting manufacturing industry upgrading are put forward.
关 键 词:生产性服务业 制造业升级 数据包络分析(DEA) 效率
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.215