地域、领域与领域融合——探讨人类社会治理的历史背景问题  

Region,Domain and Domain Fusion——Probe into the Historical Background of Human Society Governance

作　　者：张康之[1] 

机构地区：[1]中国人民大学公共管理学院,北京100872

出　　处：《新疆师范大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2016年第4期1-10,共10页Journal of Xinjiang Normal University(Philosophy and Social Sciences)

基　　金：中国人民大学科学研究基金项目重大基础研究计划"通过服务型政府建设去完善社会治理体系"(12XNL003)的阶段性成果

摘　　要：从农业社会向工业社会的转变是一个"脱域化"的过程,人们打破了地域界限而流动了起来,走出了熟人社会而进入陌生人社会。但是,工业社会在地域边界消失的地方确立起了领域界限,整个社会分化成许许多多不同的领域,其中,公共领域、私人领域和日常生活领域是三个最为基本的领域,社会治理也是建立在领域分化的基础之上。不过,从西方理论来看,学者们仅仅看到了公共领域与私人领域的差别,却忽视了日常生活领域,因而,社会治理并不能完全适应这个社会的要求,而是处处都表现出了矛盾和冲突。20世纪的一些思想家认识到了这一问题,并希望提出新的方案,比如,哈贝马斯就从公共领域和私人领域中抽象出了一个"生活世界",并试图在此基础上去探讨完善社会治理的方案,但都不成功。在全球化、后工业化进程中,建立在领域分化基础上的社会治理模式正在丧失合理性,一种领域融合的趋势正在呼唤合作治理。Shift from agricultural society to industrial society is a process of freeing from regionalization,in which people break regional bound and start to migrate and step out of familiar community and enter strangers＇ society. However,industrial society establishes domain bound where regional bound disappears and whole society differentiation into multitudes of different domains,of which public domain,private domain and daily-life domain are basic domains and social governance is also built on domain differentiation. However, judging from western theory, scholars merely see difference between public and private domains at cost of daily-life domain. Hence,social governance is not entirely applied to the demand of society but beset with contradictions and clashes. Some thinkers in the 20 th century came to realize the problem and hoped for a new project. Mr.Habermas for example abstracted a ＂life world＂from public and private domains and attempted on that basis to explore on how to improve social-governance project but in vain. In the process of globalization and post-industrialization, social governance model on domain differentiation is losing its validity, so a trend of domain fusion is calling for cooperative governance.

关 键 词：地域 领域 领域融合 社会治理 

分 类 号：C91[经济管理]