高危剖宫产妇临床治疗中不同麻醉方式的疗效分析  

Analysis the Curative Effect of Difference Anesthesia in Clinical Treatment of High Risk Cesarean Section

作　　者：吴祖辉[1] 

机构地区：[1]南阳市第一人民医院妇产科,河南南阳473000

出　　处：《中国继续医学教育》2016年第16期55-56,共2页China Continuing Medical Education

摘　　要：目的了解腰硬联合麻醉和硬膜外麻醉对高危剖宫产妇临床疗效。方法本次研究依麻醉方式不同将患者分为硬膜外组与联合组,每组患者120例。通过对比临床治疗数据了解临床治疗疗效。结果联合组的阻滞滞起效时间、最大感觉阻滞时间、最大感觉阻滞平面、感觉阻滞持续时间这四项指标统计数据分别为(14.21±4.14)min、(21.64±1.73)min、(9.54±3.11)T、(281.57±14.32)min。联合组麻醉效果优良率为100%。P<0.05,差异具有统计学的意义。联合组的恶心、呕吐、低血压等不良反应指标远低于硬膜外组。结论联合麻醉是一种比单一应用硬膜外麻醉更值得推广的临床治疗方法。Objective To investigate the clinical effect of combined spinal epidural anesthesia and epidural anesthesia on high-risk cesarean section. Methods the patients were divided into two groups according to the different anesthesia methods, the patients were divided into the epidural group and the combined group, with 120 patients in each group. By comparing the clinical treatment data to understand the efficacy of clinical treatment. Results Combined group block delay the onset time, the greatest feeling block time, the greatest feeling plane block, sensory block duration of the four indexes data were（14.21±4.14） min,（21.64±1.73） min,（9.54±3.11）T,（281.57±14.32） min. The excellent rate of combined group was 100%. The above data series, P〈0.05, was difference had statistically significance. The adverse reactions such as nausea, vomiting, hypotension and other adverse reactions in the combination group were much lower than that in the epidural group. Conclusion Combined anesthesia is more worthy of clinical treatment than the single application of epidural anesthesia.

关 键 词：腰硬联合麻醉 硬膜外麻醉 临床疗效 

分 类 号：R614[医药卫生—麻醉学]