检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:赵振军[1]
机构地区:[1]泰山学院社会工作与社会发展研究所
出 处:《中国农业大学学报(社会科学版)》2016年第4期32-41,共10页Journal of China Agricultural University;Social Sciences
基 金:教育部2011年人文社会科学研究规划项目"社会学视域中的农地集体所有制研究"(项目编号:11YJA840035)的前期成果之一
摘 要:在农地制度问题上,人们习惯性地只是注意了权力的生产,热衷于在权力的生产环节找问题。这种惯性思维的结果极易导向对集体所有制的简单质疑和否定。但现实权力不仅来自生产,也来自消费。当前农地制度的主要问题是在特定的政治体制和具体的社会生态下,农民的土地集体所有权无法消费。权力消费的低迷反过来抑制和阻断了权力的生产,从而窒息了权力本身。农民的土地权力是社会权利甚至社会制度的函数,不是所有制的函数。30年来我们的农地改革把主要精力对准农地集体所有制本身,可能没有抓住导致农地制度问题的关键。As for the farmland system issues, people habitually just pay attention to the production of power, and are keen to find problems in the process of the production of power, which will definitely lead to doubts and negation of the collective ownership. But the real power comes not only from production, but also from consumption. The main problem of the current land system is that the farmers' collective ownership of the farmland can' t be consumed in the particular political system and the specific social ecology. The low power consumption will backfire in suppressing and blocking the production of pow- er, thus limit the power itself. The farmers' rights of land is a function of social rights and social system, not a function of the ownership system. For 30 years, our rural land reform mainly focuses on the collective ownership of the farmland itself, which may not catch the key causes of the farmland system.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117