检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张皓[1]
机构地区:[1]北京师范大学历史学院
出 处:《南亚研究》2016年第2期127-152,157,共26页South Asian Studies
基 金:国家社科基金项目"蒙藏委员会委员长更迭与国民政府治藏政策演变轨迹研究"(项目号:13BMZ032)的资助
摘 要:1949年7月8日噶厦中分裂分子制造的"驱逐汉族人民及国民党驻藏人员的事件",是印度政府策划的反共事件。印度政府首先称事件为"共产党的暴动",接着称为噶厦的"反共暴动"。事件的发生时间与其对华战略密切相关。事件发生后,印度政府宣布承认中国对西藏拥有的是"宗主权"而非主权。它派遣驻锡金政治专员大雅尔入藏维持既得侵略权益,同时进一步挺进喜马拉雅山南麓各国,制造"保护国链条"。总之,印度政府当时企图制造西藏"独立"和"缓冲区",反对中华人民共和国政府恢复治藏主权。The manufacturing by Kashag separatists of an incident to expel Han Chinese and the Chinese National Government's officials from Tibet on July 8,1949 was in reality an Indian government's plot to counter the Communist Party.The Indian government first referred to the incident as a 'Communist Party riot'and later as the Kashag's 'anti- communist riots'. The timing of the incident was closely related to India's policies towards China. Immediately following the incident,the Indian government proclaimed that China maintained suzerainty and not sovereignty over Tibet. India dispatched the Dewan administrative officer in Sikkim to Tibet to maintain its interests in Tibet,while also advancing the 'chain of protectorates'manufactured by the states of the Southern Himalayas. In sum,India's ambitions were to establish Tibetan 'independence'and a 'buffer zone'as a means of resisting the return of sovereignty over Tibet to the People 's Republic of China.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.12