论专利侵权纠纷行政处理的必要性  

On the Necessity of Administrative Handling of Patent Infringement Dispute

作　　者：冀瑜[1,2] 郭飞翔[3] 

机构地区：[1]中国计量大学法学院(知识产权学院) [2]浙江大学 [3]中国计量大学

出　　处：《知识产权》2016年第7期95-99,共5页Intellectual Property

基　　金：浙江省重点软科学研究项目"电子商务领域专利保护政策及其实施绩效研究"(2016C25G2080010);杭州市哲学社会科学规划课题"中药产业现代化进程中的专利战略研究"(M15JC078)的成果

摘　　要：在专利法第四次修改中,学术界对于《专利法修订草案(送审稿)》有关专利侵权纠纷行政处理的条款有较大争议。实际上,与司法诉讼相比,专利侵权纠纷行政处理在社会成本和私人成本方面都具有优势。在效率与公平的价值追求上,行政处理与司法诉讼各有偏颇。但行政处理对效率的追求并不意味着以牺牲公平为代价,而司法诉讼由于审理期限长导致专利权人的合法权益难以得到及时有效的保障。针对新形势下出现的恶性专利侵权行为和网络专利侵权行为,需要加强专利行政保护力度以更好地保护专利权和市场秩序。In the fourth amendment of the patent law, there is a great controversy about the provisions of the administrative enforcement of patent infringement disputes in the patent law revised draft. Actually, compared with the judicial proceedings, patent infringement dispute administrative handling has advantages in terms of social cost and private cost. In pursuit of the value of efficiency and fairness, administrative handling and judicial proceedings are biased. But the pursuit of the efficiency of the administrative handling does not mean that at the expense of fairness, while the legal rights and interests of patentees can not be guaranteed timely and effectively due to the long trial period of the judicial proceedings. In the new situation, it is necessary to strengthen the patent administrative protection to protect the patent right and the market order because of the vicious patent infringement and network patent infringement.

关 键 词：专利权 专利侵权纠纷 行政处理 司法诉讼 

分 类 号：D923.42[政治法律—民商法学]