检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:宁琴荣 陈玲[1] 欧阳卫[1] 黄丁兰[1] 郭日昌[1]
机构地区:[1]广东医学院附属厚街医院,广东东莞523945
出 处:《中国医学创新》2016年第19期87-90,共4页Medical Innovation of China
摘 要:目的:探讨个性化疼痛管理对胸部外伤患者疼痛干预的效果。方法:选取2014年1-12月本院收治的胸部外伤患者198例作为对照组,2015年1-12月本院收治的胸部外伤患者198例作为试验组。对照组给予常规护理模式,试验组在对照组基础上给予个性化的疼痛管理,比较两组患者出院时的疼痛认知问卷调查情况,住院第1、3、6 d的疼痛评分、睡眠时间、Barthel指数评分及出院时患者对疼痛控制的满意度。结果:试验组疼痛认知问卷调查情况、疼痛评分、睡眠时间、Barthel指数评分及患者对疼痛控制的满意度均优于对照组,比较差异均有统计学意义(P<0.01)。结论:对于胸部外伤患者,给予个性化的疼痛管理和疼痛认知教育能大大提高患者对疼痛的认知和患者住院期间的生活自理能力,有利于患者早日康复,值得临床应用。Objective:To investigate the effect of individualized pain management on pain intervention in patients with thoracic trauma.Method:From January to December in 2014,198 cases of thoracic trauma in our hospital were selected as the control group,from January to December in 2015,198 cases of thoracic trauma in our hospital were selected as the experimental group.The control group was given routine nursing mode,the experimental group was given individualized pain management on basis of the control group,the pain perception questionnaire at discharge time,pain score,sleep time and Barthel index score of 1,3,6 days in hospital and satisfaction with pain control at discharge in two groups were compared.Result:The pain perception questionnaire,pain score,sleep time,Barthel index score and satisfaction with pain control of experimental group were better than the control group,the differences were statistically significant(P〈0.05).Conclusion:For patients with thoracic trauma,giving individualization pain management and pain cognitive education can greatly improve the patients with pain knowledge and hospitalized self-care ability,it is conducive to the early recovery of patients,worth of clinical application.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117