检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:邓志宏[1]
出 处:《廉政文化研究》2016年第3期41-50,共10页Anti-corruption and Integrity Culture Studies
摘 要:特定公权异化不仅存在于公共组织当中,也存在于非公共组织尤其是私人组织当中。私人组织的特定公权异化具有内异化和外异化两种范畴,内异化是私人组织内部个体滥用特定公权力,外异化是私人组织在公法中作为一个整体滥用其法人组织身份的特定公权力;私营企业特定公权外异化的核心意图是盈利,其次则是生存。内异化和外异化的区分依据是异化的主体身份、影响范围和行为后果,二者共有的属性是同源性、内生性和共存性。对当前特定公权异化的抑制,理想的范式是实行宏观与微观、对立面自控两种具体策略。Alienation of public powers not only exists in public organizations, but also in non-public organizations especially in private ones. Alienation of particular public powers in private organizations falls into two categories: the inner ones and the outer ones. The inner ones refer to the abuse of particular public powers by individuals within the organization; the outer alienation means the abuse of particular public powers by the organization as a juridical person in the sphere of public law. The primary purpose of alienation in particular public powers in private organizations is the profit, while the secondary aim is survival. Inner alienation differs from outer alienation in identities of subjects, influence scope and consequences. The two share the attributes of homology, endogeneity and coexistence. The ideal paradigm for the restriction of such alienations can be found in the concrete strategies from the macro and micro scopes and self-control effected by opposite influences.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.116.118.216