检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]江苏省常州市第一人民医院神经外科,江苏常州213000 [2]江苏省常州市第一人民医院胃肠外科,江苏常州213000
出 处:《中西医结合护理(中英文)》2016年第4期35-36,41,共3页Journal of Clinical Nursing in Practice
摘 要:目的探讨改良"十"字裁剪法泡沫敷料在气管切开患者中的应用效果。方法气管切开患者92例随机分为对照组和观察组,各46例。对照组泡沫敷料采用传统的圆形裁剪法,观察组泡沫敷料采取改良"十"字裁剪法。比较2组气管切开后7 d内切口感染、切口周围刺激性皮炎、护士工作量方面的差异。结果观察组切口感染和切口周围刺激性皮炎发生率均显著低于对照组(P<0.05);观察组平均换药次数,换药时间和换药费用显著低于对照组(P<0.05)。结论泡沫敷料改良"十"字裁剪法优于常规圆形裁剪方法,能有效降低气管切口相关并发症风险,提高护士工作效率,值得借鉴。Objective To evaluate the foam dressing with modified cross-shaped cutting method in patient undergoing tracheotomy. Methods A total of 92 patients undergoing tracheotomy were randomly divided into the control group and the observation group,with 46 cases in each group.The foam dressing with conventional circle-shaped cutting method was used in the control group while the foam dressing with modified cross-shaped cutting method was given to the observation group. The incidences of incisional wound infection and irritant dermatitis,nursing workload were compared 7 days after tracheotomy. Results The incidences of incisional wound infection and irritant dermatitis were lower in the observation group than those in the control group( P < 0. 05). The observation group had a less dressing changing times,overall changing time and less cost compared with the control group( P< 0. 05). Conclusion The foam dressing with modified cross-shaped cutting method is effective to reduce the risk of tracheotomy related complications and to improve the nursing work efficiency.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15