检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:杨萍[1] 徐明红[2] 胡月[2] 索宜美 姜永霞[2] 吴慧云[2]
机构地区:[1]南京中医药大学连云港附属医院护理部,江苏连云港222004 [2]南京中医药大学连云港附属医院康复科,江苏连云港222004
出 处:《中西医结合护理(中英文)》2016年第4期125-127,共3页Journal of Clinical Nursing in Practice
基 金:连云港市卫生局卫生科技项目(NO:1411)
摘 要:目的比较传统冰袋和自制冰沙混合冰袋对于高热患者物理降温的效果。方法高热患者160例随机分为对照组和观察组,各80例。对照组采取传统冰袋进行物理降温,观察组采用自制冰沙混合冰袋进行物理降温,观察比较2组的降温效果及患者舒适度。结果观察组物理降温30 min及60 min后降温效果显著优于对照组(P<0.05),24 h降温效果差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);观察组患者舒适度视觉模拟得分显著优于对照组(P<0.05)。结论自制冰沙混合冰袋能更好地贴服于患者体表,降温效果优于传统冰袋,且舒适度高。Objective To compare the physical cooling efficacy for fever between traditional ice bag and homemade Smoothie mixed pack. Methods A total of 160 patients with fever were randomly divided into control group and observation group,with 80 cases in each group. The control group adopted the traditional ice bag for physical cooling,and the observation group used homemade smoothie mixed for physical cooling. The cooling effect of the two groups and comfort level of patients were compared. Results The physical cooling efficacy at 30 min and 60 min were better in the observation group than those in the control group( P < 0. 05). There was no significant difference in physical cooling efficacy at 24 h between two groups( P > 0. 05). The observation patients had a better visual simulation score in assessing comfortable degree compared with the control group( P < 0. 05).Conclusion Homemade smoothie mixed pack can be better pasted to surface of patients,showing a better cooling effect and a higher degree of comfort.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3