检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]中华女子学院法学院
出 处:《中华女子学院学报》2016年第2期19-26,共8页Journal of China Women's University
基 金:中国婚姻家庭研究会资助项目"未成年人监护制度研究"的阶段性成果
摘 要:对100份未成年人监护案件民事判决书的实证研究表明:我国未成年人监护制度在适用中存在着法律依据混乱,单位、村(居)委会未发挥预期作用,未充分尊重当事人及被监护人意思,国家对未成年人监护干预不足等问题。依据未成年人监护立法的儿童最大利益原则、家庭自治原则和国家适度干预原则,我国应修正指定监护制度,以人民法院为唯一指定机关;尊重未成年人父母的自治权,赋予其以遗嘱指定监护人的权利;完善监护监督制度,健全国家代位监护制度,强化国家对未成年人监护的干预。Empirical research into 100 minor guardianship cases reveals some problems in the application of China’s system and point to legal provisions that are confusing, parental units and village committees for minor domiciles that are not working the way they are expected, and state intervention that isn’t enough. The system of minor guardianship should be amended according to the best interests of the child, family autonomy and appropriate intervention of the state. Firstly, people’s courts should be the only designator in terms of guardianship. Secondly, the right of designating guardians by wills should be entitled to parents. And lastly, the scope and power of state intervention should be enhanced.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15