检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:姜斌[1] 何耀[2] 左芳[1] 吴蕾[2] 刘庆辉[3] 张丽[4] 周长喜[3] 郑家强[5] 陈肇始[5] 林大庆[6]
机构地区:[1]解放军总医院南楼中医针灸科,北京100853 [2]解放军总医院呼吸科,北京100853 [3]解放军总医院康复医学科,北京100853 [4]英国伯明翰大学 [5]香港大学护理学院 [6]香港大学公共卫生学院
出 处:《中华预防医学杂志》2016年第7期640-644,共5页Chinese Journal of Preventive Medicine
基 金:国家自然科学基金,英国癌症基金会
摘 要:目的:评价盐酸安非他酮联合心理干预对戒烟门诊患者戒烟的有效性。方法采用干预研究设计,以2008年10月28日至2014年10月31日在北京某医院戒烟门诊就诊的吸烟者287例做为调查对象,其中156例患者首诊时仅接受标准的心理干预,为心理干预组;131例在接受心理干预的同时接受盐酸安非他酮辅助戒烟,定义为盐酸安非他酮组。比较了随访1、6个月时两组的7d时点戒烟率,随访6个月时两组的持续1个月戒烟率,以及随访1、6个月时两组的减烟率,采用意向性分析的统计学方法分析两组的差异。结果随访1、6个月时,盐酸安非他酮组的7d时点戒烟率均高于心理干预组[随访1个月时,两组戒烟率分别为26.0%(34/131)、15.4%(24/156),OR(95%CI)值为1.93(1.07~3.46);随访6个月时,两组戒烟率分别为27.8%(35/131)、15.4%(24/156),OR(95%CI)值为2.01(1.12~3.59);随访6个月时,盐酸安非他酮组持续1个月的戒烟率高于心理干预组,分别为26.0%(34/131)、14.7%(23/156),OR(95%CI)值为2.03(1.12~3.66)。随访1个月时,盐酸安非他酮组的减烟率高于心理干预组,分别为55.0%(72/131)、38.5%(60/156),OR(95%CI)值为1.95(1.22~3.13)。结论在戒烟门诊就诊患者中,给予患者盐酸安非他酮辅助戒烟可有效提高戒烟率和减烟率。Objective To evaluate the effectiveness of bupropion for smoking cessation among Chinese smokers at a smoking cessation clinic. Methods A prospective observational study was conducted in a hospital located in Beijing during 2008 and from 28 to 31 October 2014. A total of 287 smokers (265 men and 22 women) were assessed using data from structured questionnaires at baseline and were followed up at 1 and 6 months. Trained physician counselors provided free brief education and individual counseling sessions for all participants at the first visit. A total 131 participants were prescribed bupropion in addition to counseling. The counseling plus bupropion group was compared with the group who underwent counseling without bupropion. Outcomes were self-reported 7-day point prevalence abstinence rates at 1-and 6-month follow-up and continuous abstinence rates at 6-month follow-up. Smoking reduction rates at 1 and 6 months were also measured. Results By intention-to-treat analysis, the 7-day point prevalence abstinence rate of the bupropion group at 1 and 6 months was higher than for the counseling-only group:at 1-month follow-up, 26.0% (34/131) vs. 15.4% (24/156), with OR (95%CI) 1.93(1.07-3.46); these rates at 6-month follow-up were 27.8% (35/131) vs. 15.4% (24/156), with OR (95%CI) 2.01(1.12-3.59). The 1-month continuous abstinence rate at 6 months was higher in the bupropion group: 26.0% (34/131) vs. 14.7% (23/156), with OR (95%CI) 2.03(1.12-3.66). Participants in the bupropion group also had a higher smoking reduction rate at 1 month than those in the counseling-only group:55.0%(72/131) vs. 38.5%(60/156), with OR (95%CI) 1.95 (1.22-3.13). Conclusion Prescription of bupropion at this smoking cessation clinic was effective in doubling the quitting rates and smoking reduction rates among Chinese smokers.
分 类 号:R163[医药卫生—公共卫生与预防医学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222