创意城市与人类福祉——一个经济哲学的视角  

Creative Cities and Human Well-being: A Perspective of Economic Philosophy

作　　者：李成彬[1] 罗守贵[1] 

机构地区：[1]上海交通大学安泰经济与管理学院,上海200030

出　　处：《上海财经大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2016年第4期17-26,共10页Journal of Shanghai University of Finance and Economics

基　　金：国家社会科学基金重大项目"基于产业链;技术链与价值链融合的文化科技创新研究"(12&ZD026);上海社会科学院全球城市发展战略研究创新型智库成果(20140621)

摘　　要：熊彼特所发扬的,导源于古典经济学家的,关注创新与经济变迁的理论传统,正日渐彰显其强大的生命力。对创新的研究也逐渐从关注"创新"本身,扩展到关注创新主体及其经济的、制度的和文化的大环境,即"创新系统"。具体到城市这一中观层面,创意城市不仅关涉文化创意产业发展和创意阶层集聚,更暗含着城市作为孕育创新的有机体,其经由"人——城市——人"的循环积累所达到的提升人类福祉的可能性。从经济哲学的视角看,这种可能性至少可以从两条路径来实现:一是生产力的再解放,它可通过文化层面上创意思维对工具理性的逐步超越而获得进展;二是人类存在状态的回归,它可通过制度层面上创意劳动对异化劳动的不断扬弃而取得改善。The theoretical tradition that concerns innovation and economy changes, which was originated from the classical economists and was carried forward by Schumpeter, is increasingly manifesting its strong vitality. The focus of innovation research also shifts from innovation itself to innovation agents and its economic, institutional and cultural environments, namely innovation system. Specifically speaking at meso-level of cities, creative city is not only concerned with the development of cultural creative industries and the solicitation of creative class, but also embodies the possibility of upgrading human well-being via the citizen-city-citizen accumulation cycle by cities as organisms that breed innovation. From the perspective of economic philosophy, the possibility lies in two paths at least： the first path is the further liberation of productivity, through going beyond instrumental reason step by step by creative thinking at culture level; the second path is the recurrence of human being through gradually replacing alienated labor by creative labor at institutional level.

关 键 词：创新 创意城市 工具理性 异化劳动 

分 类 号：F062.9[经济管理—政治经济学]