检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]辽宁师范大学心理学院,辽宁大连116029 [2]辽宁大学心理咨询中心,辽宁沈阳110036 [3]沈阳市皇姑区教师学校,辽宁沈阳110036
出 处:《辽宁师范大学学报(社会科学版)》2016年第4期46-50,共5页Journal of Liaoning Normal University(Social Science Edition)
基 金:辽宁省社会科学基金项目"大学生心理疲劳及对策研究"(L14BSZ050)
摘 要:修订驾驶员危险知觉量表,并检验人格对驾驶员危险知觉技能的影响。由246名驾驶员完成中文版危险知觉技能自我评估量表和大五人格量表。结果发现:驾驶员危险知觉技能量表共6个题目,可以解释71.041%的变异;量表内部一致性系数为0.918;驾驶员自我评估的危险知觉技能得分具有性别差异;量表总分与开放性和尽责性呈正相关,与神经质呈负相关。回归分析发现:驾驶员性别、驾龄和开放性可以解释危险知觉技能31.2%的变异。结论:驾驶员危险知觉自我评估量表的信度、效度较好,人格开放性对危险知觉技能影响较大。This thesis revised the scale of driver'hazard perception skill and examined the effect of personality on drivers' self-assessed score of their hazard perception skill.246 drivers completed the Chinese version of hazard perception skills scale and the Big Five Personality Inventory.Results showed that the scale included 6items;it could explain 71.041% of the variation of hazard perception skill.The internal consistency coefficient of the scale was 0.918.Gender difference was found on the score of drivers' self-assessed hazard perception skill.The score of the scale was positively correlated with openness and conscientiousness,and negatively correlated with neuroticism.Regression analysis showed that gender,driving experience,total driving mileage and openness can explain 31.2% of the variation of hazard perception skill.Conclusion:The reliability and validity of driver's hazard perception skill scales were good;and openness can affect drivers' self-assessed hazard perception skill significantly.
分 类 号:B849[哲学宗教—应用心理学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117