检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]四川大学锦江学院,四川成都610065 [2]四川大学计算机学院,四川成都610065
出 处:《四川大学学报(工程科学版)》2016年第4期123-128,210,共7页Journal of Sichuan University (Engineering Science Edition)
摘 要:针对Canh Ngo等为安全策略评价和管理所提出的MIDD和X-MIDD方法的不足,从一般ABAC模型出发,对其进行了改进。设计了新的图结构iMIDD和iX-MIDD,新图的边用上结点变量值范围(简约的区间划分)及状态组成的元组表示,可更好地标注在决策中有关键作用的重要属性,有利于决策过程中更精细化处理。iX-MIDD的决策-叶结点也做了扩展,增加了组合算法信息,便于在对访问请求进行决策时使用。给出了应用本文方法进行策略元素匹配、策略评估,以及从iMIDD生成iX-MIDD的流程。复杂度分析及仿真实验表明,本文方法的时间、空间复杂度和性能均与MIDD方法相当。新方法完全能用于策略管理的多种应用。In order to overcome the shortcomings of MIDDs approach proposed by Canh Ngo et al, some improvements were proposed. New graph structures whose edge is a tuple of node-variable reduced interval partition and the state value marking critical attributes were designed for the improved MIDDs and X-MIDDs, named iMIDDs and iX-MIDDs respectively. In addition, the combining-algorithm identifier was also added to iX-MIDDs decision-leaf nodes. Operations and processing of policy elements match, policy evaluation, and iMIDD to iX-MIDD transformation were introduced. Complexities analysis and simulation showed both space and evaluation time complexities of proposed approach are equivalent to the MIDDs'. New approach could be applied in various policy management problems.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.145