检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]中国矿业大学力学与建筑工程学院,江苏徐州221008 [2]华北科技学院建筑工程学院,河北廊坊065201 [3]浙江理工大学建筑工程学院,浙江杭州310018
出 处:《土木工程与管理学报》2016年第4期57-62,共6页Journal of Civil Engineering and Management
基 金:河北省高等学校科学研究项目(QN2016322)
摘 要:物有所值评价对PPP项目的立项决策和PPP项目是否实现了物有所值的检验有着重要的意义,但我国物有所值评价程序和方法尚不完善。本文通过分析各国物有所值评价的时点,得出了事前评价因面临更多的不确定性从而比事后评价结果较高的结论;评价方法上,定量与定性结合的评价方法比单独定性评价的应用更广泛。本文还通过对VFM的影响因素的梳理得出VFM与项目类型关系密切,并总结出参与主体、时间、客户需求、公私协作、收入/成本五类主要影响因素。结合各国VFM评价程序和VFM影响因素,本文提出了我国完善PPP项目VFM评价程序、VFM量化方法和不同类型PPP项目推动因素等方向进行深入研究的建议。Value For Money (VFM) evaluation is important in making PPP project decisions and counting whether the PPP project has achieved VFM. However, the VFM procedure and method are still not clear in china. Based on the current situation and implementation of the procedure of the VFM in different countries, this paper analyzes the differences of evaluation time, evaluation method, evaluation procedure between countries and find that, VFM in Ex-ante assessment is often higher than in Ex-post assessment because of the uncertainty in Ex-ante, and evaluation method for qualitative and quantitative analysis is more popular than qualitative evaluation only. This paper also analyzes the influential factors of the VFM, including participants, time, customer demand, partnership, output/ input, which provide references and guidance for the further study of the VFM evaluation of PPP project together with VFM assessment program in other countries.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.112