“修昔底德陷阱”的陷阱  

Trap Embodied in“Thucydides' Trap”

作　　者：祝宏俊[1] 

机构地区：[1]南京师范大学社会发展学院

出　　处：《江海学刊》2016年第4期153-158,239,共6页Jianghai Academic Journal

摘　　要："修昔底德陷阱"这一命题已为越来越多的人所知晓,它的核心内容概括成一句话就是"国强必霸、必战"。但是,尽管这个命题借用了修昔底德的名义,也借鉴了修昔底德对伯罗奔尼撒战争原因的分析,但却曲解了修昔底德的观点。根据修昔底德的描述,雅典与斯巴达之间早已存在矛盾,但由于双方努力管控矛盾,从而维持了较长时间的和平。雅典的兴起起初只是引起了与科林斯的矛盾,但由于科林斯是斯巴达的盟友,在同盟政治的推动下,斯巴达不得不支持科林斯,最终引起伯罗奔尼撒战争。因此,雅典兴起只是伯罗奔尼撒战争爆发的原因之一。所谓"修昔底德陷阱"命题其实是现代西方的部分学者立足于欧洲近现代史,站在传统强国立场上提出的,这个命题隐含了霸权主义、帝国主义的成分,剥夺了发展中国家的发展权。The core to 'Thucydides' trap,'a widely acknowledged proposition,is often summarized as 'hegemony and wars are predicted when a power rises. 'However,this proposition,though in name of Thucydides and his account of the cause of the Peloponnesian War,is a distortion of Thucydides. According to Thucydides,friction between Athens and Sparta had long been founded although they did not escalate into a full- scale war due to an endeavor to maintain peace on both parties. The rise of Athens only caused its conflict with Corinth,not with Sparta. However,Sparta,as an alliance of Corinth in the Peloponnesian League,was dragged into war. As a consequence,the Peloponnesian War broke out. Therefore,the rise of Athens was only one of the causes for this war. The alleged 'Thucydides' trap'was actually advanced by some modern western scholars to the interest of existing powers in disguise of the modern European history. This,hiding hegemonism and imperialism in the shade,virtually attempts to deprive the developing countries of their rights to develop.

关 键 词：修昔底德 修昔底德陷阱 伯罗奔尼撒战争 

分 类 号：D80[政治法律—政治学]