中国英语学习者词汇联想反应模式相似度研究  

Exploring the profile proximity of word association response patterns of Chinese EFL learners

作　　者：陈鹏 赵翠莲[1] 

机构地区：[1]解放军外国语学院

出　　处：《外语教学与研究》2016年第4期557-568,640-641,共12页Foreign Language Teaching and Research

基　　金：陈鹏主持的2015年度解放军外国语学院科研基金青年项目"双语词汇通达机制的弗雷格语言哲学阐释"(2015XYQ005)的阶段性研究成果

摘　　要：本研究依照Fitzpatrick(2007)的反应词分类标准,通过词汇联想任务对比研究中国英语学习者和Fitzpatrick(2007)汇报的本族语者的反应模式,重点考察了学习者总体和个体反应模式的相似度。结果显示:1)学习者与本族语者的反应模式相比有系统差别,表现为学习者倾向于产出形式关联反应,而本族语者更多产出意义关联反应;2)学习者个体内部的反应相似度显著高于个体之间,说明学习者已形成个性化、差异化的个体反应模式;3)"中间联想"可能的成因有语义、语音、词形、受试误解等因素,隐性表现为一语中介、音形近似词联想等形式。By utilizing the word association response categorization established by Fitzpatrick(2007),the study uses word association test-retest to compare the response patterns of Chinese EFL learners and those of native speakers as reported in Fitzpatrick(2007),with special reference to the profile proximity of between-and within-subject responses.The results are as follows.First,there are systematic differences between learnersand native speakersresponse patterns.Learners show apreference for form-based association and native speakers for meaning-based association.Second,in terms of profile proximity,within-subject data pairs are significantly closer than between-subject data pairs.Possibly learners have developed idiosyncratic,individualized responseprofiles.Third,intermediate association may be due to semantic,phonological,formal factors as well as subjectsmisunderstanding.And it may implicitly take the form of L1 mediation,association of phonologically or orthographically similar L2 words,etc.

关 键 词：词汇联想 反应模式 相似度 学习者个体 词汇学习 

分 类 号：H319[语言文字—英语]