系统化整体护理对消化性溃疡患者疗效的研究  

Effect of systematic holistic nursing on patients with peptic ulcer

作　　者：曹霞[1] 吴昆[1] 冀红霞[1] 

机构地区：[1]内蒙古科技大学包头医学院第一附属医院消化内科,内蒙古包头014010

出　　处：《中国现代医生》2016年第18期147-149,共3页China Modern Doctor

基　　金：内蒙古自治区包头市科技计划项目(社会发展科技支撑项目)(2015S2004-5-15)

摘　　要：目的探讨系统化整体护理对消化性溃疡患者的疗效。方法选择我院2014年4月～2015年10月收治的消化性溃疡患者176例，随机分为对照组和观察组，每组88例，观察组给予系统化整体护理，对照组给予常规护理，比较两组患者入院：幻和疗程结束后的焦虑和抑郁自评结果。结果两组患者治疗总有效率比较，观察组的总有效率（86．36％）高于对照组（67．04％），差异有统计学意义（x2=5．31，P〈0．05）；两组患者入院初的SAS和SDS评分比较，差异无统计学意义（t=0．41，P〉0．05；t=0．14，P〉0．05）；两组患者治疗结束后的SAS和SDS评分差异有统计学意义（t=5．71，P〈0．05 t=2．08，P〈0．05）。结论系统化整体护理有助于为消化性溃疡患者营造和谐的治疗环境，大幅度地提高患者的疗效，值得大力推广应用。Objective To discuss the effect of systematic holistic nursing on patients with peptic ulcer. Methods 176 patients with peptic ulcer treated in our hospital from April 2014 to October 2015 were selected and randomly divided into control group and observation group, each with 88 patients. Patients in the observation group were given systematic holistic nursing, and these in the control group were given routine nursing. The self-assessment scores of anxiety and depression at admission and end of treatment were compared between two groups. Results The cure rate of observation group was 86.36%, and the cure rate of control group was 67.04%. There were significant differences in cure rate be- tween the two groups（x2=5.31, P〈0.05）. The scores of SAS and SDS at admission had no significant differences between two groups（t=0.41, P〉0.05; t=0.14, P〉0.05）; while at the end of treatment, there were significant differences in SAS and SDS scores between two groups, the difference was significant（t=5.71, P〈0.05; t=2.08, P〈0.05）. Conclusion For patients with peptic ulcer, systematic hohstic nursing and harmonious environment of treatment can greatly enhance the efficacy of treatment, which is worthy to be promoted.

关 键 词：消化性溃疡 质子泵抑制剂 系统化整体护理 

分 类 号：R473.5[医药卫生—护理学]