检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]中国海洋大学,山东青岛266100
出 处:《东北师大学报(哲学社会科学版)》2016年第4期68-74,共7页Journal of Northeast Normal University(Philosophy and Social Science Edition)
基 金:国家社会科学基金项目(15BSS011)
摘 要:日本学界近年来在钓鱼岛问题上总体呈右倾化。对这一时期日本学界的钓鱼岛论述进行剖析可知,其立场并非基于历史和现实的事实判断,而是学界与政界、军界、媒体及相关政治团体相呼应,借学术之名,瞄准钓鱼岛问题升温、安倍内阁上台及推动新安保法案出台的"大好时机",制造"国家主义"的话语热,诱导社会舆论,渲染中国威胁,推动"普通国家"进程,并谋求政治上、舆论上的话语权。The Japanese academia has shown the trend of right-deviationism since 2012. The analysis on the discussion of Diaoyu Islands by Japanese academia in this period has made it clear that the stand of Right-deviationism is not based on the judgment of history and reality, but because the academy circle has made up a boom of discursive construction of "nationalism" together with political circle, military circle, mass communication and related political organizations in the name of academy,aiming at the time of growing of Diaoyu Islands problem and coming to power of Abe Cabinet as well as the issue of the Security-related Laws,so as to guidance the public opinion, create "China threat", promote the process of "normal state" and to get control of political and public discourse right.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117