网络片面共同犯罪的制裁边界:兼议“快播”案  

On the Boundary for Criminal Sanctions on Network One-Sided Accomplice Crimes and a Discussion of the “Qvod Player”Case

作　　者：孙道萃[1] 

机构地区：[1]华南理工大学法学院,广州510006

出　　处：《浙江工商大学学报》2016年第4期52-60,共9页Journal of Zhejiang Gongshang University

基　　金：国家社会科学基金一般项目"科技风险的管理与公共安全的刑法保障"(11BFX106);最高人民检察院理论研究所重点课题"检察机关对行政执法活动的监督"(GJ2015B02);2016年度广东省地方立法研究高校联盟青年立法资助项目"广东省地方立法公众参与机制完善研究"

摘　　要：我国主要采取犯罪共同说,对片面共同犯罪持谨慎立场。共同犯罪的网络异化导致片面共同犯罪陷入理论和司法适用困局,司法解释和立法修改先后共同促成制裁网络片面共同犯罪的新格局。网络运营商和服务提供商明知负有网络安全管理义务、仍积极提供网络帮助或放任不管且造成法律所不允许的风险时,具有实质的可罚性。但应根据主客观要件综合判断网络正常业务行为的处罚边界。依法公开审理"快播"案昭示制裁网络片面共犯的司法导向。According to the criminal law,the Chinese legislation has taken extremely cautious standpoint towards to the one-sided accomplice crime. The alienation of the network joint crime has led the one-sided accomplice crime into continuous theoretical and legislative difficulties. A series of judicial interpretation and legislative changes as contour-measures have been established to initiate the survival scope of one-sided accomplice crime have taken shape. Network operators and service providers who bear statutory safety management obligations violate those obligations knowingly and have further brought about considerable risk or serious harm. Substantial penalty is necessary for irresponsible and illegal mismanagement by the web service providers. The thresholds of punishment towards to the network one-sided accomplice crime should be limited and restrained by reasonably distinguishing normal business behavior from dangerous behaviors based on full consideration of subjective and objective criminal elements simultaneously. The prosecution of ＂Qvod Player＂Case has vividly confirmed the actual judicial demand for punishing network one-sided accomplice.

关 键 词：网络片面共同犯罪 网络安全管理义务 正常网络业务 “快播案” 

分 类 号：DF611[政治法律—刑法学]