从欧洲议会“五月决议”审视中国“非市场经济地位”之意涵  

Reexamining “Non-Market Economy Status” of China after European Parliament Resolution of May

作　　者：张政[1] 

机构地区：[1]华东政法大学

出　　处：《海关与经贸研究》2016年第4期113-122,共10页Journal of Customs and Trade

摘　　要：中国在《加入世贸组织议定书》中所承诺的"非市场经济地位"历经15年已近期满,与国内学者不同,国外学者和政府的观点多认为中国并不能在期满后自动取得"市场经济地位"。合理解读《中国加入世贸组织议定书》可以发现,中国在其中清楚地表达了中国生产者的举证义务到期终止的意图,WTO进口成员方不能在嗣后仍然要求中国生产者对市场经济体承担举证义务。该义务终止后并不发生举证责任的"倒置",也不会影响中国作为国家在WTO中的经济体属性。但即便如是,中国承担的歧视性义务终止后,在多边贸易体系内会具有更多对抗不合理反倾销措施的合法手段,并提升对抗措施的成功率。The ＂non-market economy status＂as promised by China in the Protocol on the Accession has expired after 15 years after the date of its accession. Unlike Chinese scholars,foreign scholars and governments generally hold that China will not obtain its ＂market economy status＂automatically after termination of the term. China has expressed clearly its intention in the Protocol on the Accession that the termination should exempt Chinese producers from the burden of proof. The import members of WTO shall not require the Chinese producers to bear the burden of proof that market economy conditions prevail in the industry. But the termination of the burden does not result in neither the ＂shift of burden of proof＂nor a change in the economy status of China as a WTO member. However,China will have more legitimate and effective approaches against unreasonable anti-dumping measures from import members after the termination of the term.

关 键 词：非市场经济地位 替代国价格 反倾销 《中国加入世贸组织议定书》 

分 类 号：D996[政治法律—经济法学] F743[政治法律—国际法学]