授權、確權和侵權程序中權利要求解釋規則的異同  

Differences and Similarities of Rules for Claim Construction in Patent Grant,Validity and Infringement Proceedings

作　　者：任曉蘭 

机构地区：[1]國家知識產權局專利複審委員會人事教育處

出　　处：《中国专利与商标》2016年第3期30-43,共14页China Patents & Trademarks

摘　　要：权利要求的解释是专利法领域一个永恒的话题。一直以来，围迁权利要求的解释，争论多集中於具体的解释规则，尤其是如何正确处理利用说明书及其附图的内容对权利要求进行解释与不恰当地将说明书及其附图中的内容引入到权利要求中之间的关系。但是，有一个问题不应忽视。即授权、确权和侵权程序中权利要求的解释规则是否应当相同，或者如果存在不同的话，不同将体现在哪些方面。Claim construction is an eternal topic in the field of pat- ent law. Discussion on claim construction has always been concentrated on specific rules for construing claims, in par- ticular how to correctly deal with the relationship between claim construction utilizing the contents of the description and drawings and improper introduction of those contents in- to the claims. However, there is one issue that should not be ignored, that is, whether the rules for claim construction in patent grant, validity and infringement proceedings shall be the same. or if not. what are the differences therebetween？

关 键 词：权利要求 授权 程序 侵权 异同 求解 说明书 专利法 

分 类 号：TP31[自动化与计算机技术—计算机软件与理论]