检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:周奥杰[1]
机构地区:[1]四川大学法学院,成都610207
出 处:《暨南学报(哲学社会科学版)》2016年第8期86-92,共7页Jinan Journal(Philosophy and Social Sciences)
基 金:教育部人文社会科学研究规划基金项目<民法典编纂视野下统一民事责任制度>(批准号:15YJA820039)
摘 要:人格权具有人身专属性,为自然人所专有,与主体密不可分。不法性排除模式,并不否定自然人允许他人利用其人格权要素的权利,只是明确这种"允许"的实质是"同意"而非"转让",是"自愿限制"而非"商品化"。此外,人格权单独设编不是体现人格权重要性的恰当方式,应将人格权规定在总则部分并对其进行优先保护;人格权单独设编仅是体例上的技术性安排,对促进人格权保护难以起到实质性作用。建议在民法典制定时,依据人格权的性质和民法典编纂的应然逻辑,将在理论和实务上业已成熟的具体人格权,规定在总则的自然人部分或民事权利部分,并通过兜底条款对司法实践承认和创制新型人格权保持开放。Personality right is exclusive and closely connected with the subject of right,so it cannot be commercialized. Stipulating personality right in the general part under the part about natural person make it able to present the whole picture of the human in civil law and shaping a right to complete image of subject of right in the civil law. Layout Personality right separately is not the right way to reflect its importance,stipulating personality right in the general part and giving priority to it is a better choice. With tort law taking thorough protection of personality right,the role of independent personality right law is weakened. Its content is relatively thin,provision is relatively few,and it is difficult to constitute an independent part.Based on the nature of the personality right and the logic of compiling the civil code,suggesting that formulate personality right in the part of general principles,and keep open for the developing of personality right.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.217