美国科学基金绩效评估中的若干关键问题  

Key issues concerning NSF performance assessment

作　　者：陈建俞[1] 

机构地区：[1]上海交通大学医学院科技发展处,上海200025

出　　处：《中国科学基金》2016年第4期379-384,共6页Bulletin of National Natural Science Foundation of China

摘　　要：美国科学基金绩效评估是在GPRA框架下,结合基础研究的特殊性,针对战略目标开展的评估活动。美国科学基金采用定量与定性相结合的评估方法,外部专家分别从项目层次、计划层次、科学部层次和部门层次对战略结果目标进行"自下而上"的评估,而管理人员利用内部数据库对管理目标进行评估,并由外部第三方来证实。美国科学基金绩效评估目的是改进其管理工作的效率,使有限的科研资源得到优化配置,其核心目标是将评估的最终结果作为制定部门预算的重要依据。NSF performance assessment is ongoing under the GPRA framework, combined with the particularity of basic research. NSF employs a mix of both qualitative and quantitative methods to assess and evaluate strategic goals. Formalized examination takes place during merit review of project, COV and AC/ GPA assessments, and GPRA reporting. Additionally, NSF administrative staff and managers make use of internal data system to assess and review progress in achieving the quantitative management goals, with selected results verified by external third parties. Its purpose is to improve the management efficiency and make the limited research resource optimize configuration. Its core goal is to make the assessment results as the important basis for planning department budget.

关 键 词：GPRA NSF 绩效评估 战略目标 外部专家评审法 

分 类 号：G327.12[文化科学]