走向革命洪流的文学批评家——论茅盾文学批评生涯之1920—1927年  

Literary Critic Involved in the Revolution——On Mao Dun's Literary Criticism Career from 1920 to 1927

作　　者：张霞[1] 

机构地区：[1]西华师范大学文学院,四川南充637009

出　　处：《西华师范大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2016年第4期18-23,共6页Journal of China West Normal University:Philosophy & Social Sciences

基　　金：四川省社会科学"十二五"规划项目一般项目(SC14B081)

摘　　要：1920年代初,茅盾有着文学批评家与政治活动家的双重身份。这两种身份最初在他身上能够和谐共存,但随着革命形势的发展及生存境遇的变化,茅盾开始更多地投入社会政治运动,其双重身份随之失去平衡。聚焦于茅盾1920年至1927年7月的人生轨迹,可以发现,在茅盾文学批评生涯的第一个阶段内,由于政治语境及生存境遇的转换,茅盾的文学批评在数量和内容上都有明显的变化。生存境遇与个人性格、理想抱负相结合,让茅盾走向革命洪流,其文学批评写作逐渐让位于政论、杂感类写作,其"为人生"的文学主张也逐渐被"为革命"的主张所取代。这一发展与变化轨迹,在茅盾这段文学批评生涯中留下了清晰的印迹。At the beginning of the 1920's,Mao Dun had a dual identity of literary critic and political activist. His two different identity initially could coexist in harmony,but with the change of the development of revolutionary situation and his living circumstances,Mao Dun began to devote himstlf to the social and political movement,for which his double identity lost balance. The trajectory of life,Focusing on Mao Dun's life journey from 1920 to July of 1927 can we in the first stage of Mao Dun's literary criticism career,due to the change of,living circumstance the political context and the,Mao Dun's literary criticism has obvious changes in the number and content. The combination of survival circumstances and personal ambition,Led Mao Dun to the powerful current of revolution. With his literary criticism writing gradually giving way to political comment and writing style of random thoughts,'literature for life'has been replaced by 'literature for revolution'. The track of development and changes left clear traces in Mao Dun's literary criticism career.

关 键 词：文学批评家 政治活动家 革命洪流 生存境遇 

分 类 号：I206[文学—中国文学]