英美陪审制度及其程序价值考论  

Anglo-American jury system and its procedural values

作　　者：汪栋[1] 

机构地区：[1]山东农业大学文法学院,山东泰安271018

出　　处：《东南大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2016年第4期114-125,148,共12页Journal of Southeast University(Philosophy and Social Science)

基　　金：国家社科基金一般项目"宪法程序的英国普通法渊源研究"(10BFX054)成果之一

摘　　要：英美陪审制度源远流长,就早期历史而言,其中蕴藏的权利价值并不突出,均势政治力量之间的相互制衡的意义更重要。经近代自然权利理论的改造,陪审制才确立牢固的价值基础,它所蕴涵的权利元素才释放出巨大的能量,成为现代英美国家治理和人权保障的重要程序技术。当代陪审制盛极而"衰"的原因在于替代性的多元价值整合机制的兴起,制度成本增加,以及法的形式理性对于陪审制实质理性整合功能的过度抑制。今日陪审制衰而不败,具有顽强的生命力,是因为陪审制作为"实践权利的技术"不仅具有程序理性,更等同于权利价值本身。Regardless of its long history,Anglo-American jury system in its early period was valued for its checks and balances of political powers rather its right value. After the reform by natural right theory,jury system established its substantial value basis and therefore became a very important procedure technology to administer a country and to protect right. The modern jury system began to wane due to the rise of alternative integration mechanism of multiple value,the increase in institutional cost,and the over-restraint,by the formal rationality of law,on its function of substantive rationality. Jury systems are intrinsically valuable today because of its procedural rationality and value of right.

关 键 词：陪审制 自然权利 程序技术 形式理性 实质理性 

分 类 号：D956.1[政治法律—法学] D971.2DD916