日本现代建筑的转型 20世纪70年代以来对东南亚建筑发展的影响与遗存  

Japanese Modernity Deviated Its Importation and Legacy in the Southeast Asian Architecture since the 1970s

作　　者：肖靖[1] 薛求理[2] 

机构地区：[1]香港城市大学建筑学与土木工程学系 [2]香港城市大学深圳研究院

出　　处：《时代建筑》2016年第3期144-151,共8页Time + Architecture

基　　金：国家自然科学基金(51278438);2012年日本佳友财团基金会项目(128003)

摘　　要：文章梳理了20世纪70年代以来在东南亚建筑的现代性发展的背景中,日本战后建筑思潮的输入成为隐藏的推动力的历史脉络;对于包括新加坡在内的东南亚各发展型国家来说,日本战后建筑之所以有着举足轻重的作用,是因其体现了从一种作为主流现代主义建筑的发展分支到形成独特理论体系的转型。通过分析丹下健三和桢文彦两位日本代表性建筑师在东南亚地区的建筑活动,文章揭示出两者针对地区历史文脉持有迥异的设计策略;他们在融合与对立之间以不同方式实践着对现代文化的认同。This article examines architectural development in Southeast Asia since the 1970s as the legacy of a modernity imported through foreign paradigms, in which Japan played a leading role. Postwar Japanese architecture, initially characterized by derivativeness, is argued to have transformed into a discourse on deviation of modern architecture. The nature of post-war Japanese architecture＇s influence on the Association of Southeast Asian Nations （ASEAN） countries, especially Singapore, is studied here through a particular association with historical situations as developmental states. Two case studies--Kenzo Tange and Fumihiko Maki--are chosen for their different perspectives on Japanese architecture, which provide an alternative example of modern identity in Southeast Asian architecture that interacts with and contradicts local contexts. The authors reveal a forgotten story in the architectural development of Southeast Asia and Japan.

关 键 词：日本建筑 现代性 转型 东南亚建筑 发展型国家 新加坡 

分 类 号：TU201[建筑科学—建筑设计及理论]