检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]贵州省水利水电建设管理总站,贵州贵阳550002 [2]贵阳市水利水电勘测设计研究院,贵州贵阳550002 [3]贵州乾龙建设项目管理有限责任公司,贵州贵阳550002
出 处:《水电能源科学》2016年第7期143-145,207,共4页Water Resources and Power
基 金:贵州省科技厅;水利厅2007年综合重大科研专项经费项目(黔科合重大专项字(2007)6012号)
摘 要:针对传统抽水试验和Lugeon压水试验的不足,在同一钻孔内分别进行了分段压水试验和完整井抽水试验,并根据两种试验得到了试验钻孔处渗透系数剖面分布,分析了采用非稳流压力法测量岩体渗透系数的可行性和准确性。结果表明,压水试验与抽水试验的渗透系数并无显著差异,尤其非稳定流压水试验所需的试验时间更短,其所要求的试验条件易于获得,且准确性和可操作性更优。Aiming at the shortcomings of traditional pumping test and Lugeon packer test,staged packer permeability test using unsteady phreatic flow as well as pumping test were carried out at the same drill hole.And the profiles of permeability coefficient were obtained by both tests.The feasibility and accuracy of rockmass permeability coefficient measured by unsteady flow pressure method was analyzed.The results obtained by the two tests were not significantly different with each other.The packer permeability test was more feasible since it consumed less test time and the requirements for its operation were easier to be satisfied.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.113