理性-经验加工对不公正情绪和行为反应的影响:公正敏感性的调节作用  

The Effect of Rational vs. Experiential Processing Style on the Emotional and Behavioral Reactions towards Injustice: The Moderating Role of Justice Sensitivity

作　　者：刘燕君[1,2] 马红宇[1,2] 梁娟[1,2] 刘喆[1,2] 马露露[1,2] 杨林川[1,2] 

机构地区：[1]青少年网络心理与行为教育部重点实验室,武汉430079 [2]华中师范大学心理学院,武汉430079

出　　处：《心理科学》2016年第4期942-948,共7页Journal of Psychological Science

基　　金：国家自然科学基金青年项目(31200795);国家自然科学基金重大研究计划重点支持项目(91324201);华中师范大学中央高校基本科研业务费项目(CCNU14Z02015)的资助

摘　　要：基于认知-经验理论,采用行为实验法和情境故事法,探讨了不同信息加工方式对不公正情绪和行为反应的影响,以及受害者敏感性对两者关系的调节作用。结果表明,与理性加工相比,经验加工下个体对不公正有更强烈的负性情绪反应,合作意向更低;受害者敏感性调节加工方式与不公正行为反应之间的关系,即受害者敏感性低时,加工方式与人际公正对合作意向交互作用显著,受害者敏感性高时,加工方式与人际公正对合作意向没有交互作用。Perceived justice strongly influenced people＇s behaviors attitudes and feelings in organizations friendships and other daily life situations.Specifically, it has been shown that experiencing unfair outcome allocations or unfair procedures leads people to feel much more sad and angry about the events happened to them. Despite the fact that the researchers have paid more attention to fairness reactions, relatively little is known about what psychological processes drive people＇s reactions to justice judgments. In the present article, we explored the role of the processing style in people＇s reactions to injustice. The study was based on the cognitive- experiential self-theory, one of the dual processing theories, which specified two information processing styles, and through which justice/injustice reactions can occur： experiential and rational. Whereas experiential processing occurs relatively subconsciously and effortlessly, rational processing entails deliberate thinking and weighing of the evidence. And experiential processing often involves the use of emotion and other heuristics as information, whereas rational processing involves more evidence-based and logic decisions. Consequently, we speculated that when people got in different situations they might have different reactions to injustice depending on whether they viewed the transgression through an experiential or a rational processing frame. We designed two specific studies to support our hypothesis. Study 1 used a laboratory method, and a 2 （processing style： experiential vs. rational） ×2 （procedure： accuracy vs. inaccuracy） between-group experiment was conducted. Results from a sample of 91 college students showed that both the procedure and processing style had main significant effects on positive emotion, negative emotion and cooperation intention. And the interaction effect between procedure and processing style on positive and negative emotion, cooperation intention was also significant. In other words, processing style moderat

关 键 词：理性-经验加工 公正公正敏感性 情绪 合作意向 

分 类 号：B848.4[哲学宗教—心理学]