对缓解期支气管哮喘患者进行气道反应性测定的临床价值分析  

Analysis of evaluation of doing airway responsivenss for Bronchial Asthma patients in paracmasis

作　　者：张红 

机构地区：[1]四川省地矿局405医院,四川都江堰611830

出　　处：《当代医药论丛》2016年第13期10-11,共2页

摘　　要：目的:分析对缓解期支气管哮喘患者进行气道反应性测定的临床价值。方法:将近年来我院收治的168例缓解期支气管哮喘患者纳入研究组,将同期我院收治的168例非支气管哮喘患者纳入对照组,对两组患者分别进行气道反应性测定,然后对比观察其检测结果。结果:与对照组患者相比,对研究组患者进行组胺激发试验结果的阳性率较高,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。与对照组患者相比,研究组患者PEF、FEV1.0、FVC、FEV1/FVC%、FEF50%、FEF(25-75)%的指标均较小,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:对缓解期支气管哮喘患者进行气道反应性测定可准确分析其是否发生气道高反应性及发生气道高反应性的程度。缓解期支气管哮喘患者的气道常呈高反应性,若未进行长期规范的治疗其病情可持续进展。Objective： to analysis of asthma remission in patients with airway reactivity was measured to guide clinical treatment. Methods： a randomly selected i n October 2013 June 2015 in our hospital asthma remission 168 patients by, named as study group; randomly selected over the same period in our hospital for examina tion and treatment without tracheal wheezing asthma patients with 168, named as the control group. Of two groups of patients underwent bronchial histamine provocatio n test observed two groups of patients with airway reactions. Results： the study group has 146 for histamine excitation test was positive, and the control group without po sitive study group of histamine provocation test was positive than that of the control group（P〈0.05）, the PEF, FEV1.0, FVC, FEV1/FVC%, FEF50%, FEF（） and（25-75） were significantly different from the control group（P〈0.05）. Conclusion： airway responsiveness in asthmatic patients was significantly higher than that in patients with asthma.

关 键 词：支气管哮喘 气道反应性 组胺 激发试验 缓解期 

分 类 号：R562.25[医药卫生—呼吸系统]