检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]华南理工大学公共管理学院,广州510640 [2]华南理工大学经贸学院,广州510640
出 处:《公共管理学报》2016年第3期122-134,159,共13页Journal of Public Management
基 金:国家社会科学基金重大项目(11&ZD057);中央高校基本科研业务费基地培育项目(2015JDPY09)
摘 要:补助性财政专项资金政策是政府调控利益关系,实现社会公平正义的重要工具,具有典型的中国特色。运用政府绩效评价的理念与方法,对广东省三项省级补助性财政专项资金绩效第三方评价结果的研究发现,政策目标的实现程度与预期存在较大差距,目标出现走样。究其原因在于:理论源头存在悖论、专项设立论证不足、绩效目标流于形式、主体责任缺位错位、政策社会认同度低,等等。与财务审计不同,财政支出绩效评价以政府(部门)为主要对象,重点关注专项资金设立及分配的科学性与民主性,是对政府决策的一种"评判与纠错机制"。现实条件下,推进第三方绩效评价是检验与遏制绩效目标走样的可行手段,为我国"压专项,增一般"的财税改革注入了动力,有利于推进现代财政制度建立,提高公共财政的公信力与执行力。Subsidy fiscal policy,which has typical Chinese characteristic,can be an important governmental tool to balance the social and economic benefits as well as to promote social justice. By adopting the concept and methodology of government performance evaluation,results from a third-party evaluation to three special fiscal funds within Guangdong Province show that there's a big deviation between the realizations of the policy goals and their original expectations,which leads to the so called 'losing-shape policies'. As for the reasons,there exists a theoretical paradox in the establishment of such policies,and they also come to the insufficiency of policy demonstration,the policy goal being a mere a formality,the absence of implementation responsibility as well as the low policy support. Different from financial audit,fiscal expenditure performance evaluation takes government departments as the main targets,focusing its attention in the scientificity and democracy of special funds' establishment and allocation. In other words,it is an evaluation and correction mechanism to government decision error. Therefore enhancing the third-party evaluation can be a possible measure to examine and suppress the policy goals' losing shape,which provides motivation for China's reform in finance and tax. This also contributes to building a modern financial institution and promoting its public credibility as well as implementation efficiency.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222