检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《中华现代护理杂志》2016年第6期836-839,共4页Chinese Journal of Modern Nursing
摘 要:目的:探讨大面积烧伤患者发生谵妄实施护理干预的有效性。方法选取30例大面积烧伤患者发生谵妄的病例,按照入院日期分为观察组(15例)和对照组(15例),对照组给予常规护理,观察组实施心理、行为、危险因素控制等干预措施,比较两组患者谵妄的好转率,以及急性生理和慢性健康状况评分(APACHE Ⅱ)、治疗干预评分(TISS)的结果。结果观察组好转率73.33%,对照组好转率33.33%,两组比较差异有统计学意义(χ^2=15.208,P〈0.01);观察组APACHE Ⅱ、TISS评分优于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(P〈0.05)。结论护理干预的实施,提高了大面积烧伤患者谵妄的好转率,同时改善了患者的预后,值得临床广泛推广和应用。Objective To explore the effects of nursing intervention in extensive burn patients with delirium. Methods A total of 30 extensive burn patients with delirium were divided into observation group ( 15 cases, interventions in control of psychology, behavior, risk factors and so on ) and control group (15cases, routine care ) according to admission date. Then, results were compared between two groups involving improvement rate in delirium, scores of acute physiology and chronic health evaluationⅡ( APACHEⅡ) and therapeutic intervention scoring system (TISS). Results The improvement rate was 73. 33% in observation group and 33. 33% in control group with a statistically significant difference (χ^2 =15. 208, P〈0. 01). Scores of APACHEⅡ and TISS in observation group were better than those in control group, and there were significant differences between two groups (P〈0. 05). Conclusions The implementation of nursing intervention increases the improvement rate of extensive burn patients with delirium and improves patients prognosis, so it is worthy of clinical promotion and application.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.166