检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《南昌大学学报(人文社会科学版)》2016年第3期63-70,共8页Journal of Nanchang University(Humanities and Social Sciences)
基 金:江西省社会科学"十二五"规划项目"美国惩罚性赔偿研究"(13FX19)
摘 要:惩罚性赔偿作为一种特殊的私罚在侵权法中独树一帜。美国现代司法上的丰富判例为我们呈现了这一历史悠远制度的现代发展脉络和新近动向,同时其深厚的实践积累与理论成果为我国侵权法中惩罚性赔偿的进一步探索和架构带来许多启示。数额上有效威慑尺度的掌控、对象上具体商业领域的权衡以及判罚上参考因素的考量这些源于美国司法中的经验与教训,值得我们借鉴与深思。Punitive damages as a kind of special lynch is unique in Tort Law. Rich legal precedents of American modern judicial have showed us the modern development skeleton and the newest trend of this long history system. At the same time,its profound accumulation of practice and theoretical achievements for our future exploration and framework of our punitive damages in Tort Law have brought a lot of enlightenment. The control of the amount of effective deterrent scale,the weigh of the object on specific business field and the consideration of the reference factors on penalty,all the experiences and lessons that came from American judicial system will be worthy of our reference and consideration.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.229