英美刑法中的“危害原则”研究--兼与“社会危害性”比较  

On the Harm Principle in Anglo-American Criminal Laws:And Compared with Social Harmfulness Principle

作　　者：姜敏[1,2] 

机构地区：[1]西南政法大学法学院 [2]西南政法大学外国及比较刑法研究中心

出　　处：《比较法研究》2016年第4期60-74,共15页Journal of Comparative Law

基　　金：笔者主持的国家社科基金项目“交通风险语境下间接危害行为犯罪化研究”(批准号:13CFX046)的阶段性研究成果

摘　　要：危害原则是英美刑法的核心原则,其以对他人利益造成危害为国家刑罚权划定边界。危害原则的旨意在于保护公民自由,从而保证公民享有寻求发展和追求幸福的自主权。危害原则亦蕴含着公民在选择行为实现自我权益时不得危害他人利益。因此,危害原则既是国家刑法强制干预的道德标准,亦是公民个人行为选择的道德标准。与中国刑法的社会危害性相较,二者表面上有相似之处,但在内涵、价值和终极诉求上存有显著差异。中国刑法在走向法治化的道路上,应借鉴英美刑法危害原则体现的法治精神,尊重公民寻求幸福的正当自主权,从而淡化重秩序的浓烈工具主义色彩。The harm principle, with the purpose to protect the freedom of the citizens so as to assure that people have autonomy rights to develop themselves and purchase life of happiness, is the core principle in Anglo-American criminal laws, also implies that people can not harm oth themselves. Therefore, The harm principle i and sets the boundary for criminal law. The harm principle ers ＇ s not moral standard for the citizen＇ s individual principle in Chinese criminal law, the two are the connotation, value and the ultimate pursu by law, so it should learn the spirit of the benefit when they choose what they do to realize only the moral standard for state＇ s coercion but also behavior choice. Compared with social harmfulness prima facie similar, but they are substantially different in t. Chinese criminal law is on the road to realize the rule rule by law in harm principle, respecting the justified autonomy rights of the citizens to eliminate strong instrumentalism focusing on social order.

关 键 词：危害原则 社会危害性 自由 公民自主权 

分 类 号：D914[政治法律—刑法学]