检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张亚男[1]
机构地区:[1]黑龙江省医院检验科,黑龙江哈尔滨150000
出 处:《中国继续医学教育》2016年第20期31-32,共2页China Continuing Medical Education
摘 要:目的 分析糖尿病慢性肾衰竭患者血糖检验方法及价值。方法将本院2015年1-12月接诊的糖尿病慢性肾衰竭患者62例作为研究对象,按就诊日期的单双号分两组,各31例。对照组血糖检验选用葡萄糖氧化酶法,实验组血糖检验选用已糖激酶法。对比两组检出率。结果实验组早期检出率相对比较高,94.74%〉88.89%,差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05)。两组晚期检出率相当,分别为91.67%和92.31%,差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05)。结论 糖尿病慢性肾衰竭血糖检验采用葡萄糖氧化酶法和已糖激酶法,均有较高临床价值,但已糖激酶法早期检出率相对较高,应视个体情况合理选择。Objective Analysis blood glucose test method and value on diabetic patients with chronic renal failure. Methods From January 2015 to December 2015, 62 diabetic patients with chronic renal failure treated in hospital as study objects, which were separated into two groups according to their hospital-visitation date number (odd number and even number), 31 cases in each group, the control group were given glucose oxidase method, the study group were given about hexokinase method, and then compare detection rate between two groups. Results Detection rate in earlier stage in study group was higher than that in control group, 94.74%〉88.89%, was differential has statistic value (P〈0.05), there is no big difference between two groups in terms of detection rate in later stage, 91.67% and 92.31%, was no statistic value is to be observed (P〉0.05).Conclusion Both glucose oxidase method and hexokinase method are of application value on diabetic patients with chronic renal failure, while, detection rate of hexokinase method in earlier stage is a bit higher than the other one, it is suggested to select a reasonable method in consideration of patients’ condition.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.128.226.211