无痛分娩和常规分娩的质量比较分析  

Comparative Analysis on the Quality of Painless Labor and Routine Delivery

作　　者：王凤双[1] 

机构地区：[1]黑龙江省佳木斯市妇幼保健院妇产科,黑龙江佳木斯154002

出　　处：《中国继续医学教育》2016年第20期96-97,共2页China Continuing Medical Education

摘　　要：目的分析无痛分娩和常规分娩的质量。方法将240例健康的产妇分为试验组和对照组,各120例,其中试验组给予低浓度的罗哌卡因联合芬太尼硬外膜阻滞进行无痛分娩;对照组采用常规分娩镇痛。分析两组的镇痛效率,分娩的途径,流血量,留院的时间和新生儿健康状况,比较两组的优缺点。结果试验组剖宫产20例,伤口的感染5例,留院观察的时间为(2.0±0.8)d,新生胎儿窒息1例,生产的时间(5.5±3.0)h,与对照组相比均有显著性的差异,数量少于对照组。结论无痛分娩更加有助于产妇生产和胎儿的健康,伤口的感染率低,降低了剖宫产的几率。Objective To investigate the quality of painless labor and routine delivery by accurate test. Methods 240 cases of healthy parturients were divided into test group 120 cases and control group 120 cases. The test group was given a low concentration of ropivacaine combined with fentanyl hard outer membrane block method for painless childbirth; in the control group is normal labor analgesia. Through the analysis and comparison of the analgesic effect of the two groups, the way of delivery, bleeding volume, the time of stay in hospital and the health of newborn, the advantages and disadvantages of the two groups were compared. Results Experimental group cesarean section production in 20 cases, 5 cases of wound infection, to leave courtyard observation time （2.0±0.8） d, 1 cases of fetal asphyxia and production time （5.5±3.0） h, compared with the control group there were significant differences, far less than the number of control group. Conclusion The results show that painless childbirth is more conducive to maternal production and fetal health, low infection rate and reduce the rate of uterine incision delivery.

关 键 词：无痛分娩 常规分娩 分娩的质量 

分 类 号：R714.4[医药卫生—妇产科学]