论反垄断诉讼中的专家证人资格与专家证据之可采信标准  

On Expert Qualifications and the Admissibility of Expert Testimony in Anti-monopoly Litigation

作　　者：郑鹏程[1] 刘长云[1] 

机构地区：[1]湖南大学法学院,湖南长沙410082

出　　处：《湖南大学学报（社会科学版）》2016年第4期147-151,共5页Journal of Hunan University(Social Sciences)

基　　金：国家社科基金重大项目:"垄断认定过程中的相关市场边界划分原则与技术研究"(12&ZD200);国家社科基金重点项目:"反垄断相关市场界定基本法律问题研究"(13AFX021)

摘　　要：反垄断是最需要专家的法律领域之一,因此,专家证人在现代反垄断诉讼中的使用非常广泛。但专家证人的地位与作用与普通证人不同,专家证人有资格方面的要求,一般只有专门研究反垄断法的经济学家或法学家才有资格作为专家证人。专家证言必须可靠并且契合案件事实。与专家证人资格有关的信息、与经济学有关的知识应当在诉讼过程中予以披露。Anti-monopoly is one of the most expert-driven areas of law, and expert witness is extremely popular in modern anti-monopoly litigation. However, the position and role of expert witness is different from that of perceptual witness, and a proposed witness should have sufficient knowledge or experience to qualify as an expert. Only an economist or a lawyer who specially studies anti-monopoly law is qualified for expert witness. Expert testimony must be reliable and fit the facts of the case. Information concerning ex- pert qualifications and economics knowledge should be disclosed in the litigation process.

关 键 词：反垄断诉讼 专家证人资格 信息披露 

分 类 号：D971.2[政治法律—法学]