检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张瑛[1]
机构地区:[1]河南省商丘市第一人民医院儿童重症监护室,476100
出 处:《中国实用医药》2016年第18期14-15,共2页China Practical Medicine
摘 要:目的探讨鼻塞式持续气道正压通气(CPAP)治疗重症毛细支气管炎患儿的疗效。方法 100例重症毛细支气管炎患儿随机分为治疗组40例与对照组60例。治疗组在常规综合治疗的基础上给予鼻塞式CPAP辅助治疗,对照组在综合治疗的基础上给予鼻导管或头罩吸氧。比较两组治疗3、5、7 d后的治疗效果。结果治疗组患儿治疗3、5、7 d后总有效率均高于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.01)。结论鼻塞式CPAP辅助治疗重症毛细支气管炎疗效显著,值得推广应用。Objective To investigate curative effect by nasal continuous positive airway pressure(CPAP) in the treatment of severe capillary bronchitis children. Methods A total of 100 severe capillary bronchitis children were randomly divided into treatment group with 40 cases and control group with 60 cases. The treatment group received nasal CPAP as adjuvant therapy in addition to conventional comprehensive treatment, and the control group received nasal catheter or hood oxygen inhalation in addition to conventional comprehensive treatment. Curative effects in 3, 5, 7 d after treatment were compared between the two groups. Results The treatment group had all higher total effective rate in 3, 5, 7 d after treatment than the control group, and their differences all had statistical significance(P〈0.01). Conclusion Nasal CPAP provides precisely curative effect as adjuvant therapy of severe capillary bronchitis, and it is worth promoting and applying.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222