“中等收入陷阱”的内在机理与实证分析——以知识产权效应为研究视角  

Themechanism and empirical analysis of middle income trap:From the view of IPR effects

作　　者：朱慧[1] 徐卫彬[1] 

机构地区：[1]浙江工商大学经济学院,浙江杭州310018

出　　处：《科学学研究》2016年第8期1161-1168,1202,共9页Studies in Science of Science

基　　金：浙江省哲学社会科学规划项目(14NDJC145YB);教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地重大项目(13JJD790030);教育部省部共建人文社会科学重点研究基地浙江工商大学现代商贸研究中心项目(12JDSM18YB)

摘　　要：知识产权保护已经成为经济增长的重要动力,受到广泛关注。沿用Woo等的观点将知识产权保护分为直接效应与间接效应,分析"中等收入陷阱"的内在发生机理。随后,收集42个国家1980-2005年的面板数据进行实证检验,并得到以下主要结论:首先,中等收入国家知识产权直接效应较弱,高收入国家知识产权直接效应较强;其次,中等收入国家的知识产权保护与自主创新呈非线性关系,而且自主创新是中等收入国家经济增长的主要推动力;最后,高收入国家的知识产权保护与自主创新之间呈较显著的正相关关系,而自主创新对经济增长的影响则不显著。IPR Protection has become the main engine of economic growth and gained wide attentions. Based on the the views of Woo et al, departs IPR protection into direct effects and indirect effects to analyse the mechanism of middle income trap. Then collect data from 42 countries to test what find theoretically and get the follow conclusions： Firstly, middle income counties have weak direct effects while high income counties have strong direct effects; secondly, there exist a non - liner relationship between IPR protection and inno- vation in the middle income counties, and innovation is the most important factor for middle income counties＇ economic growth; finally, high income counties have strong positive relationship between IPR protection and innovation, but the relationship between innovation and economic growth within high income country is weak.

关 键 词：知识产权效应 自主创新 中等收入陷阱 经济增长 

分 类 号：F061.2[经济管理—政治经济学] F062.3