检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:余慧[1]
机构地区:[1]陕西师范大学政治经济学院,陕西西安710062
出 处:《学术探索》2016年第8期14-20,共7页Academic Exploration
摘 要:国内关于马克思主体性思想的研究正以四种方式开展着——历史性研究、知识考古式研究、比较哲学式研究、澄清式研究,其所呈现的研究群相则是追寻马克思关于主体性的思考如何从前马克思时代的哲学思考中发展出来,即所谓思想史研究,其中最富代表性的成果则是认为马克思洞穿了近代西方主体性思想固守的意识内在性问题,而开创了新的主体论范式。然而检视这些研究成果则会发现国内的马克思主体性思想的研究则是阐述和诠释有余,而批判和反思不足。Domestic research on Marx's subject and subjectivity is usually carried out in four ways : historical research, archaeo- logical knowledge investigation, comparative philosophy; clarifying, which share the same tendency of how Marx's thinking on subject and subjectivity had evolved from his philosophical thinking, namely, the so - called research of ideological history. One representative research of them holds that Marx had broken through the problem of ideological immanence of modem Western subjectivity and created a new subject paradigm. However, an examination of these studies finds that there are too much descrip- tion and interpretation, while not enough in criticism and reflection on Marx's subject and subjectivity in China.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28