检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]浙江财经大学会计学院
出 处:《财会通讯(中)》2016年第7期79-82,共4页Communication of Finance and Accounting
摘 要:反向购买交易中借壳公司和壳公司股东利益的均衡问题,为资本市场投资者和财务学界关注的焦点。2013年海澜之家以反向购买方式借凯诺科技上市,账面权益相差无几的两家公司,双方股东获得的股份数量比为85.61:14.39,交易是否公平疑惑顿起。本文基于资产估值和财务数据,发现海澜之家的交易作价有偏高之嫌,凯诺科技的价值相对低估,因此,这一规则和程序正义交易的公平性值得商榷,并引发对借壳上市时机选择、交易定价以及报表合并等问题的思考。The balance of the shareholders interest of the backdoor and shell companies in reverse purchase transactions,is the focus of the capital market investors and financial scholars.Hailan Home listed on the Quinones Technology through a reverse merger in 2013,the difference of the book interests between the two companies was small,the proportion of the number of shares available for both the observation and analysis on asset valuation and financial data,we found that Hailan Home in the transaction price is too high,the value of Quinones Technology is relatively undervalued.Therefore,the fairness of this rule and procedural justice is open to question,and triggers thinking of the timing choice on backdoor listing,the pricing and the consolidated financial statements problems.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3