中英受贿犯罪立法比较研究  被引量:6

Comparative Research about the Anti-Bribery Law between China and the UK

在线阅读下载全文

作  者:高铭暄[1] 曹波[1] 

机构地区:[1]中国人民大学法学院,北京100872

出  处:《法学杂志》2016年第8期1-14,共14页Law Science Magazine

摘  要:英国《2010年反贿赂法》是英国贿赂犯罪立法改革的最终成果,是迄今为止最为严厉的反贿赂法之一。在受贿犯罪立法上,该法坚持以"零容忍"态度打击受贿行为,采用单一罪名模式,以"受贿罪"一罪规制各形各色的受贿行为,统合公共领域和私营领域受贿犯罪,并以"不正当行为模式"为根基,建构受贿罪的犯罪构成,确定"受贿罪"的刑事责任。尽管我国受贿犯罪立法与英国《2010年反贿赂法》具有相当差异,但我国可积极借鉴英国的有益经验,严密惩治受贿行为法网,整合规制受贿行为的法律规范体系;重视私营领域受贿犯罪,拓宽打击私营领域受贿犯罪的范围;改进受贿犯罪之犯罪构成,扩充贿赂范围并确立过错推定规则;完善受贿犯罪刑事责任,革新刑罚处罚标准并优化刑罚体系。Bribery Act 2010, the toughest act ever, is the achievement of legislative reform on bribery in U. K. , which shows a "zero tolerance" attitude to taking bribery. It takes a single - charge mode to sweep diverse bribery including public and private - owned business field, and constructs the constitutive elements of crime and verifies criminal liability by misconduct mode. In spite of the differences, bribery legislation should actively learn from the good experience of U. K. , so as to consolidate the legislative base of combating against bribery, integrate regulations and laws on bribery, attach importance to the private sector bribery, broaden the breadth of combating private sector bribery, refine the crime constitution of bribery, extend the scope of bribe, establish the subjective fault presumption rules, perfect criminal liability of bribery and improve punishment standard and optimize penalty system.

关 键 词:受贿犯罪 《2010年反贿赂法》 立法比较 

分 类 号:D956.1[政治法律—法学] D924.3

 

参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

耦合文献:

正在载入数据...

 

引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

同被引文献:

正在载入数据...

 

相关期刊文献:

正在载入数据...

相关的主题
相关的作者对象
相关的机构对象