近代日本的刑法学派之争及其特色  

The School Argument of Criminal Law and Its Characteristics in Modern Japan

作　　者：付立庆[1] 

机构地区：[1]中国人民大学法学院,北京100872

出　　处：《法学杂志》2016年第8期26-36,共11页Law Science Magazine

基　　金：笔者所主持的教育部青年基金项目"近代日本刑法史"(项目编号:10YJC820030)的阶段性成果

摘　　要：日本近代刑法理论经历了从明治初期的折衷主义到新刑法前后的新派理论,再到之后的新旧两派的"学派"之争,并在二战后逐步走向扬弃和融合的过程。在这一过程中,理论上的争论始终与立法变动密切相关。同时,在论争过程中,既可看出群体性对抗,又可领略个人的魅力。日本近代的刑法学派之争,虽受德国影响,却又展现出明显的本土特色:新派理论先行于旧派且较为彻底,旧派理论则出现了折衷的倾向,主流理论更显示出国家主义的立场。Criminal law the eclecticism in the early theory in modern Japan went through the process which began from Meiji period to the new school around the promulgation of the new criminal law, then to the later opposition between the new school and the old one, and phased out into the sublation and integration of different schools after World War II. During the process, the contention of theories was closely related to the change of legislation. Meanwhile, it has seen both the group confrontation as well as the personal charisma in the contention. In spite of the influence from German criminal law theory, the school contention of criminal law in modern Japan manifested its own domestic characteristics： the new theory emerged before the old one and took a more thorough position, while the old theory had the tendency to eclecticism, and the mainstream theory greatly showed the position of nationalism.

关 键 词：折衷主义 新派 旧派 国家主义 自由主义 

分 类 号：D931.3[政治法律—法学] DD914