反垄断私人诉讼的证据开示制度研究  

The Study of the Evidence Discovery in the Private Antitrust Litigation in China

作　　者：厉潇逸[1] 

机构地区：[1]中国政法大学民商经济法学院,北京100088

出　　处：《法学杂志》2016年第8期134-140,共7页Law Science Magazine

摘　　要：反垄断私人诉讼是反垄断法执法的重要组成部分,是传统的反垄断公共执行的重要补充。目前我国审理反垄断案件适用"谁主张,谁举证"这样一般的民事诉讼规则,但垄断案件具有很强的特殊性,受害人很难发现和证明垄断行为。原被告之间的力量失衡、司法救济被动性延迟以及现有的制度框架缺乏激励,极大地限制了反垄断私人诉讼的有效实施。在考虑我国传统的诉讼基础和现行的法律制度基础上,我国应保留证据开示制度的优点并进行相应的改良,将其引入我国反垄断私人诉讼。Private antitrust litigation is an important part of the anti - monopoly law enforcement, it is also an important supplement of the traditional anti - monopoly public executions. In China, antitrust cases now follow ＂who advocate, who proof＂ in civil procedure. However, monopoly cases so different from other civil cases that the victims were difficult to find and prove monopoly behaviors. The imbalance between the plaintiff and the defendant, the passive delay of Judicial Relief and lack of incentives existing institutional framework greatly limits the effective implementation of private antitrust litigation. In considering the basis of Chinese traditional litigation and on the basis of the current legal system, we should keep the merits of the system of evidence discovery and improve it, introduce it into Chinese private antitrust litigation.

关 键 词：反垄断私人诉讼 证据交换 证据开示制度 

分 类 号：D922.294[政治法律—经济法学] D925.1[政治法律—法学]