出 处:《中华小儿外科杂志》2016年第8期582-588,共7页Chinese Journal of Pediatric Surgery
摘 要:目的探讨新生儿期起病的化脓性关节炎治疗方式的选择。方法回顾性分析我院2004-2015年收治的新生儿期起病的化脓性关节炎患儿52例,其中男37例,女15例,平均起病年龄(17.5±7.6)d,入院年龄(32.6±10.7)d。44例(48个关节)获得8个月至10年的随访,平均随访(4.5±1.2)年。根据治疗方式将获得随访的48个关节分成A组(保守治疗)、B组(传统切开排脓一期关闭伤口+术后灌洗引流)和c组(切开排脓VSD引流+二期关闭伤口)。分析患儿的临床表现、影像学结果、治疗方式以及最终结局。结果52例患儿中,36例(69.2%)接受了手术治疗,14例(26.9%)接受保守治疗。A、B、C三组的平均延误治疗时间(15.0±8.7)d;A组的延误治疗时间(20.0±8.2)d,显著大于B组[(9.7±7.1)d]和C组[(14.6±8.2)d](P〈0.05)。A、B、C三组患儿的静脉滴注抗生素时间为(16.9±8.5)d。A组的静脉用药时间[(13.9±5.8)d]显著小于B组[(21.6±12.6)d](P=0.015)。A、B、C三组的起病年龄、入院年龄、住院天数、术前影像学评分差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05)。在获得随访的48个关节中,35个关节获得完全恢复(72.9%),A、B、C三组痊愈率差异无统计学意义(P=1.000)。B组和C组合并为一个手术组,其痊愈率为72.7%,手术组和非手术组痊愈率差异无统计学意义(P=0.882)。髋关节的痊愈率为33.3%,显著低于膝/踝关节(85.0%),以及肩/肘关节(78.9%)。根据Logistic回归分析,术前影像学评分(RR=2.991)、以及是否累及髋关节(RR=9.743)是预测患儿是否有残留畸形或功能障碍的影响因素(P〈0.05)。结论新生儿期起病的化脓性关节炎患儿起病隐匿,容易漏诊和延误就诊。对于起病早期的患儿和累及髋关节的患儿,推荐积极手术�Objective To explore the treatment strategies of septic arthritis with a neonatal onset. Methods From 2004 to 2015,52 babies of septic arthritis with a neonatal onset were treated. There were 37 boys and 15 girls with a mean onset age of 17. 5 ± 7. 6 days and a mean admission age of 32. 6 ± 10. 7 days. And 44 patients (48 joints) were followed up for a mean period of (4. 5 ±1.2) (2/3- 10) years. Based upon treatments, these 48 joints were divided into groups of A (conservative treatment), B (traditional open operative drainage) and C (open operative drainage with vacuum sealing drainage). Their clinical characteristics, treatments and outcomes were analyzed. Results Among 52 patients, 36 patients (69. 2%) were operated while another 14 (26.9%) received conservative treatment. The mean time from onset of infection to hospitalization was 15.0 ± 8. 7 days. And this time was significantly larger in group A (20. 0 ±8.2 days) than group B (9. 7 ± 7. 1 days) and group C (14. 6± 8. 2 days) (P〈0. 05). The mean time of intravenous antibiotic therapy was 16. 9 ± 8. 5 days. And this time was significantly shorter in group A than that in group B (13. 9 ± 5.8 vs. 21.6 ± 12. 6 days) (P = 0. 015). Among groups A,B,and C,no significant differences existed in age of onset,age at admission and pre-treatment imaging score (P〉 0. 05). During follow-ups, 35 joints recovered completely (72. 9%). No differences existed among groups A, B, and C (P = 1. 000). The combined recovery rate of groups B and C (operative group) was 72. 7%. No difference existed between operative and non-operative groups. And 33. 3% of hips recovered completely. And it was significantly lower than knee/ankle (85.0%) and shoulder/elbow (78. 9%). According to logistic regression analysis, pre-treatment imaging score (RR = 2. 991 ) and hip joint involvement (RR = 9. 743) were important predictors of unfavorable outcomes (P〈0. 05). Conclusions Difficulties in a
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...